Though the text does embrace some modern artists, like Mel Chin, the examples are outdated. For a survey it has relevance, but it’s not related for an upper division art historical past course. The e-book does not embrace a lot materials post-1960, lacks illustration beyond Europe and Western civilization, and is mild on feminine contributions.

The text is organized thematically, however there could be room for chronology to play a bigger role, maybe in particular person topics/chapters or with an appendix that can hint again to image examples throughout the textbook. The textual content covers a broad array of art actions both this contact form geographically, and temporally, though I think the non-Western choices are a bit slim. There are a number of mentions of modern/contemporary art, however the authors often present hyperlinks to pictures somewhat than embedding them.